Since 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and European guidelines have recommended manual therapy as first- line treatment for MSK ill-health. Manual therapy is an approach where Practitioners of Manual Therapy (PoMT) use hands-on data acquisition and analysis (HODA-A) as a measurement instrument for research, diagnosis, prognosis, and a tool for treatment. Yet manual therapy techniques fail all reliability studies, therefore without proof that hands-on is a valid and reliable method of data collection, this very much limits the conclusions that can be drawn from using the hands in MSK healthcare.
INTRODUCTION
HYPOTHESIS
Using a different sample of testers, when all proposed measurement theories for HODA-A are applied, a testers observation-based methods and palpatory-based methods are reliable and accurate.
RECRUITMENT
Twenty healthy volunteers with recognised manual therapy qualifications (14 men aged 23.5 ± 8.1 years and six women aged 23 ± 0.8 years) were recruited within manual therapy learning institute. Of the volunteers, two men aged 37.5 ± 21.9 years with 9.5 ± 7.8 years’ experience were randomly allocated to be tester’s.
Passive, supine leg length discrepancy test was used, to enable a valid assessment of structure due to minimal effects of gravity and fatigue on the testee’s MSK systems (Zink & Lawson, 1979). This strategy was used to make every effort to reduce extraneous variables, and therefore the measurement of each testee’s systems would be under basal conditions. The testers were required to palpate simultaneously the testee’s left and right medial malleoli’s and provide the relative spatial parameters of the leg lengths.
Prior to any data collection, the examiner set-up each testee in all studies to meet the specific criteria that had evolved from preceding experiments. A reflective journal was kept by the examiner noting observations from the testee’s and testers during each experiment. This reflection prevented any impaired memories when recalling the experience over a longer time frame (Almeida, 2005). The examiner oversaw all experiments, journaled any events that may be of interest, and analysed the final data submitted by the tester’s.
Plinths were far enough apart that data collection from each tester was blinded to the other testers’ data. Testee’s were barefoot and laid supine on the plinth. A ‘true’ result of the test condition was known to examiner. Once the experiment began, they were instructed not to fidget, talk, chew, or look around the room. The tester stood at the caudal end of the plinth, placed both hands around the testee’s ankles, such that their thumbs were level with the medial malleoli. They were instructed to bring the testee’s legs into the midline, without tugging the legs. The testers were instructed to use all five constructs of HODA-A to identify the testee’s leg length position in millimetres, noting which leg was longer and which leg was shorter. Blinded to one another, testers completed, and submitted, a data ticket. The testers then moved to the next testee and only one round of testing was conducted.
Conclusion
Albeit, HODA-A has been applied for 30,000 years to heal others, continued research into its reliability, as seen in this small pilot study, suggest that HODA-A lacks the necessary standard needed to inform patient care. Nevertheless, the neurophysiological evidence proposes two known observation-based errors i.e., parallax and perspective error, can reduce HODA-A performance. To date, the evidence-based research exploring inter-tester reliability, has not yet explored if controlling for one, or both, of these observation-based errors during a MSK assessment can improve the level of agreement and accuracy of HODA-A. The following experiment shall control for parallax error to see if the level of agreement between testers, or percentage correct can be improved.
0 responses on "STUDY 4"